In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move out of the cities and into regional areas. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, industries and businesses have been in the transition from cities to specific areas due to the urbanization plans of the authorities. In my perspective, I reckon that this tendency can bring positive benefits to the society accounted for the living quality
On the one hand, residents are beneficial from this trend due to several reasons. Firstly, they can mitigate health risks caused by industrial operations. It is the subordinate products such as fumes and sewages directly discharging into the environment that can affect both animals’ and humans’ lives. To illustrate, some research shows that the global warming emission could spoil the lung cells during respiration, transferring them into tumors ones. Nevertheless, if these factories can move to particular locations, it can relieve the risk of wellness, improving residents' living quality and physical strength.
On the other hand, there are some drawbacks that government should consider if they are encouraging this tendency. Firstly, it can trigger detrimental impacts on businesses. In fact, the labor force is obligated to commute further to the workplaces due to the long distance. As a result, they may undergo a sense of weariness stemming from the loss of physical energy, leading to distraction; thereby, reducing their work efficiencies and reducing the company’s revenue. For instance, employments usually thrive the infrastructures, especially the company’s dormitories since their employees may suffer from physical damage if they commute to work on a regular basis.
In conclusion, I incline to the positive impacts of this tendency since environmental improvement plays an essential role in ensuring the resident’s living quality. Therefore, the authorities should have an appropriate urbanization plan to assert the merits and mitigate the demerits
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-16 | baokhuyen759 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-25 | Pau Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | Shivam1512 | 11 | view |
| 2021-04-03 | Fatehaulakh09 | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | quynhnhu1921996 | 73 | view |
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities Therefore some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move out of the cities and into regional areas Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people say that all young people should have full time education until they are 18 years old To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he society accounted for the environment On the one hand, residents are beneficia...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69003690037 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14752144489 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623616236162 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7576585241 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.615384615 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0930957080489 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329750922213 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04716691217 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0527673412779 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374544867128 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.