Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution. Some people believe government should be in charge of this, while others believe it is the fault of individuals. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution. Some people believe the government should be in charge of this, while others believe it is the fault of individuals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The environmental degradation engendered by transportation has raised an intricate conundrum among a great majority of people. Opinions differ as to whether the government or individuals should take responsibility in dealing with the pollution caused by transportation. Much as I agree that the government is partly responsible for the dispute, I think more duty should be placed on individuals per se.
On the one hand, people who claim that the government is obliged to deal with such a bleak reality of pollution have a number of plausible supports for their viewpoint. To commence with, it has been widely acknowledged that the government is responsible for assuring the safety of a nation’s environment, therefore they unarguably must enforce policies restricting actions that pose threats to its degradation. Moreover, by enacting laws against the rampant utility of transportation, the government shows concern for the prosperity of a region concerning every aspect of it. Such an action would immensely heighten the respect of dwellers to their authority.
Another school of thought, mine included, is that each individual must be accountable for the threat posed by transportation to the environment. Firstly, there is no room for doubt that a fresh atmosphere would ensure a healthy and balanced physical life for every single human being. With that being stated, it is the duty of individuals to maintain an uncontaminated environment, since we are the first ones to benefit from it. Adding further, governmental policies would prove fruitless without the realization of each person's obligation to save the planet. Simply speaking, restraining oneself from a financial benefit at the cost of the environment should be acted out of pure realization in lieu of restriction from an authority, for it is feared that a set of written rules would be overshadowed by a person’s financial greed.
All in all, the above-mentioned discussion has elaborated on why the responsibility is on both the government and individuals. My viewpoint, however, has it that individuals should be obliged to deal with such a looming predicament.
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 61
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others feel that there is more advantage to living in an apartment Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment 78
- What are the pros and cons for children of watching television 89
- Some individuals think that working from home while of benefit to employees is actually a drawback to employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university What are the advantages and disadvantages for their study 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...eat majority of people. Opinions differ as to whether the government or individuals should ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 523, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...uitless without the realization of each persons obligation to save the planet. Simply s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.3376753507 324% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37830687831 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27959218863 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6079052567 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.588235294 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2352941176 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337099471176 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117893760303 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151702275668 0.0667982634062 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255560810209 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.314140660792 0.056905535591 552% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.