Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not effective. Education and job training should be used instead. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people assume that educational opportunities and vocational training should alter prison sentences because putting lawbreakers into jail is not the ultimate answer. However, I suppose this is a one-sided point of view and therefore disagree with it.
There are a plethora of compelling reasons why it is unreasonable to consider imprisonment is an antiquated practice. A prison sentence serves as one of the embodiments of justice and fairness in society. Should a person engage in unlawful acts, be it a misdemeanor or a felony, they ought to be thrown into jail, or else communities will encounter anarchy. Moreover, prisons are not only the physical place that keeps criminals and protects innocent people but also a reminder of the consequences of combating the law. For instance, when a person intentionally caused major crimes such as abduction, sexual assault, human trafficking, or arson, they could receive life in prison. During prison time, they are rehabilitated successively and some will probably agonize over their wrongdoings.
Although progressive education and job training can bolster a person’s cognitive and employability, and lessen crime rates in theory, they are not capable of diminishing all the elements that induce a person to become a criminal. Facts have shown that there have been multiple heinous crimes conducted by well-educated citizens, for example, several people working in the state in Vietnam involved in corruption, smuggling, or attempted murder. Therefore they made their country fall into chaos, and lack a sense of safety and security. We cannot disregard that those who are morally bad by nature and psychologically unstable may show a propensity for crime because of their uncontrolled thought and behaviors.
In conclusion, better education and job training are not a significant solution, nor they can replace prison sentences. It is the combination of both methods that can succeed in reducing crime levels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-01 | nle.hngoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | llrasthy J | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | kencchan | 52 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | nganphuong05 | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exampl 73
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 73
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...uption, smuggling, or attempted murder. Therefore they made their country fall into chaos...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45901639344 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07548323866 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7911120114 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199706836584 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605251402955 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584479413803 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123000677594 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426438691234 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...uption, smuggling, or attempted murder. Therefore they made their country fall into chaos...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45901639344 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07548323866 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7911120114 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199706836584 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605251402955 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584479413803 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123000677594 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426438691234 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.