Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the protection of the environment is the government's obligation rather than individuals. In my opinion, I think that protecting the earth is the responsibility of both governments and individuals
On the one hand, It is true that some environmental issues are too big for individuals to deal with. In order for serious problems, such as global warming, prolonged droughts, violent storms, or other extreme weather events, to be effectively addressed, it requires the efforts and cooperation of politicians and large environmental organizations. This is because solving such problems requires special equipment, the use of modern technological devices and large numbers of experienced scientists to work together. For instance, it takes years for researchers to collect various samples and analyze huge amounts of data in order to know the major causes of global warming and to help them find the most effective solutions to tackle this problem. Only governments can have sufficient funds and resources to invest in this.
On the other hand, there are various proactive measures to preserve the planet by residents. Initially, inhabitants should use public transport instead of private vehicles which can diminish the toxic emissions, as well as the main cause of global warming. Besides, using increasingly biodegradable packing or cloth-made bags will be contributed to reduce domestic waste when shopping for groceries. I think that without the cooperation of both politicians and individuals, environmental issues will never be effectively tackled. For example, if farmers continue to burn forests for their own purposes, regardless of the government’s regulations, the problem of climate change will never be successfully mitigated.
In conclusion, for the reasons aforementioned above, I believe that protecting the environment is the task of both politicians and individuals.
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they should not waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi tech media such as computer software videos and DVDs with this statement 61
- Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table shows the percentage of students giving a good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010
- The table shows the percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...he protection of the environment is the governments obligation rather than individuals. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66550522648 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28540204915 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606271777003 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5873046398 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14819924076 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526088252385 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579978617487 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933185427165 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261678668739 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.