The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the bar chart delineating the rate of money given to charity by four age groups of British people namely 18-25, 26-35, 36-50, 51-65 and older than 65 during a 20-year phase, commencing in 1990.
It is conspicuous that the figures in the 1990s and 2010 both had myriad differences in groups. Futhermore, in the first year, the 36-50 aged people spent most money while the reverse was true for people in next age group.
When it comes to the percentage of money which charity was donated in the 1990s, the youngest group's number was only about 17% which was lower nearly 14% in comparision with the 26-35 group. Following with these younger people, the 36-50 and the 51-65's rate was approximately 43% and 35% , it was followed by the oldest people groups with 33% reported.
In terms of that figure in the next 20 years, it can be seen that people belonging the youngest group used only 7% money for charity organizations, while that number of the two next following.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-10 | kavi jk | 59 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | MiaPhan_09 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | Simon31 | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | kevann | 73 | view |
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 11
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many things can influence the academic achievement and emotional growth of a student In this regard peers have more of an impact than teachers do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onspicuous that the figures in the 1990s and 2010 both had myriad differences in ...
^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost money while the reverse was true for people in next age group. When it comes...
^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...1-65s rate was approximately 43% and 35% , it was followed by the oldest people gr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68023255814 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38833970102 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.28729119 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.166666667 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151886208755 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802295802204 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542447827507 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10409446037 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455443378061 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.