Some people believe that culture will be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue, but others consider that tourism is the only way of protecting a culture. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
With the development of the service-based economy, tourism plays a vital role in the national economy. Many people think that tourism develops too fast and that leads to many matters of concern about the national culture while others believe it helps to maintain culture, especially national culture with distinctive features.
On the one hand, it can be true that tourism brings many positive impacts on maintaining the traditional culture. Firstly, the government spends more on the national budget to rebuild and preserve many monuments, heritage structures, and historical places over the years. This action helps introduce the value of culture and history to both locals and foreigners and attracts many visitors to travel to explore amazing things in these countries. This is also a chance for locals to have a chance to take a deep understanding of the country’s culture, remind them about our ancestor’s victory and also their sacrifice for the country's freedom. Secondly, tourism is a motivation for both authorities and citizens to protect intact natural habitats and improve the quality of the overall beautification of surroundings to increase the quality of tourism, preserve original culture and advertise the beauty image of the country to abroad.
On the other hand, there are many drawbacks for the traditional culture that come from tourism. Nowadays, tourism is a new industry which has more potential revenue. Therefore, many locals find more ways to take advantage of culture to catch up with the newest trends and make money. Year after year, they gradually change their local natural habitats for commercial purposes that leads to possible loss of cultural practices. For example, Sapa is known as a popular tourist attraction in Vietnam but now there are plenty of tourist places that are only used to take a picture or check - in that it is easy to lose their customs in culture. Secondly, the infrastructure is seemingly not built with any particular plan. Therefore, it leads to the loss of the beauty of some old buildings there.
In conclusion, it can be undenied that tourism has some negative effect in our life, especially tourism, I believe that tourism is a key field that helps not only to preserve the national culture but also boost the country's development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-20 | thaohienpt008 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | cactuss5 | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-04 | mridulaielts | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | nguyen thi thu hien | 86 | view |
- Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country An alternative view is that they can adapt to a new environment by establishing a minority community Discuss these two views and give your opinion 67
- Some people think that video games are advantageous while others believe video games are harmful to the people who play them Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drink that has been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Studies suggested that nowadays children watch more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative 61
- Companies should provide sports facilities physical acitivites to have a healthy well beings for local communities To what extent do you agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onal culture with distinctive features. On the one hand, it can be true that tou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19302949062 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76894992781 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528150134048 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8795533952 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.133333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259077004121 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845577742336 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750810978078 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177757140375 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511378970801 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.