Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important. To what do you extent agree or disagree?
It has been a subject of perennial debate as to whether making future plans is a futile exercise and concentrating on the present moment is more essential. While I acknowledge that planning for the future may be unfavourable moderately, this essay sheds light on why I strongly oppose it
Firstly, it is reasonable that preparing for the future is advantageous to a certain extent. One of the major benefits which are derived from this might be the motivation to push forward in life. In fact, those who accept the present and leave their future an entirely unanswered question might hardly have the willingness to determinedly step out of their comfort zone and strive towards achieving their precious goals. As a consequence, having future plans can undoubtedly get people the readiness to cope with unforeseeably harsh situations as well as fulfill their life in the most meaningful way.
Secondly, notwithstanding the aforementioned upside, there is no doubt that preparing for the future is disadvantageous. Indeed, the future can be unpredictable and we do not know what will happen afterwards. As a result, staying focused on the forthcoming plans is not always suitable. Instead, setting the mind in the contemporary moment can help people react and respond appropriately to the current problems to prevent them from affecting the future.. However, I would reiterate that future plans should also come along with backup plans so that we can prepare for changing circumstances.
In conclusion, although planning for the future may be disadvantageous to a certain degree by virtue of the uncertainty of the future, I espouse the notion that future plans are beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-29 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | dqnghuy | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 73
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will no longer be necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 84
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 78
- Many people are now spending more and more time traveling to work or school Some people believe that this is a negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Communication between employers and workers is the most important factor Other people say that other factors are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... has been a subject of perennial debate as to whether making future plans is a futile exercis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...o prevent them from affecting the future.. However, I would reiterate that future ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24814814815 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13557620453 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603703703704 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4078991242 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.818181818 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226219980128 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850827860982 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044769509594 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138855337682 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234291081897 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.