The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
This passage will show the average levels of participation in education and the highest learning stage for adults in the years from two thousand to two thousand and ten in Singapore.
In 2000, the average female adult participation years are less than the years of male adult participation, for females, it is 8 compared to the 9 years average of male involvement, this trend continues until we reach 2010. In witch, the average male contribution is 11.9 compared to the 9 of female inclusion in education; these numbers show that female participants have more time outside of education facilities than male participants in the learning system.
As for the highest learning stages in 2000 and 2010, it is to be noted that the highest level in 2010 was for high school participation with 32.15, then secondary schools with 26.3, primary school, 25.77, 8.5 for university qualification, and finally 7.5 for master qualification. For 2010 the numbers change drastically, with university qualification increasing to 32.93, master qualification ascending to 30.31, high school qualification decreasing to 19.55, secondary schools amount to 15.2, and at dead last are primary schools with only 2.1 for qualifications.
- More and more wild animals are on the verge extinction and others are on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 73
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 84
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 78
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, second, then, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35416666667 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14781601427 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.0210468031 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 205.6 112.824112599 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.4 22.9334400587 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280360347836 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16053355498 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100110078682 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209880441527 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966546683379 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.0 13.2329268293 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.