Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Many people believed by some students who study higher education ought to study what they are interested in, others think they should be inspired to learn curriculum that will be helpful for future such as science and technology. In this essay I completely agree with this statement rather than drawback for some reasons.
First of all, it is true that children are able to motivated by studying the field they are ardent because people tend to work hard and have the dedication to achieve their purpose. In the other word, when people are not easily giving up and do not get bored, it becomes more productive. For example, allowing children to learn in the area of their interest is beneficial because there is no need to worry about the wasteof human resources and their time. As result, they may not choose to work as a professional in the field which they have been forced to learn.
However, firstly, allowing the teenagers to study only the course which will be useful for the future can be helpful when they do not know what they actually want to be. Since the parents know their child the best, the children will be put on the right track by adults' guidance. In fact, they can apply those subjects in the future and they are able to stand on their own feet. Secondly, by allowing the subjects for the future needs, children will become more involved in developing living standards and environment. so, children can create better work and contribute to upcoming science breakthroughs.
To sump up, from where I stand I considered to give the chance for the children to choose subjects they like, it can be more productive and efficiently.
- At the present time the population of some contries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- the tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five european contries Summarise the informationby selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Is this a positive or negative development 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Other however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 56
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
...ldren will be put on the right track by adults guidance. In fact, they can apply those...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...oping living standards and environment. so, children can create better work and co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in fact, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7456445993 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44753616808 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543554006969 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4704962951 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412800477129 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136104935003 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134757749588 0.0667982634062 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239242033921 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113511742274 0.056905535591 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.