The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore

Essay topics:

The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.

The below charts demonstrate the average levels of educational participation, along with the highest education stages in Singapore among adults from 2000 till 2010.
For the most part, educational participation along with different genders has noticeably rose throughout the years. Followed with beneficial impacts. Nevertheless, these impacts led to a variety in the educational levels and stages.
According to the bar charts illustration of the educational participation between men and women over the years. Take for example, from 2000 till 2004 there was a slight rise in educational partaking of both adult males and females, that’s barely mentioned. Clearly, the highest rate in educational association was among adult males than females. In contrast with 2008 & 2010 there had a noticeable increase in educational enrollment. As the chart represents the educational enrollment among both males and females has reached its peak at 2010. There’s no doubt that the rate of females participating in education progressively climbed up in comparison to the past years.
As shown in the circle chart there’s a great difference in the educational qualifications of several stages from 2000 to 2010. This ten years difference had an impact on the percentage of educational qualifications. To show contrast, in 2000 & 2010 the qualifications of school stages; primary, secondary and high school. In 2000 Primary was one quarter as for secondary, but just over a third for high school. While in 2010 stages rated differently, primary went down to an insignificant amount, secondary shifted to less than a fifth and high school percentage remained constant. Moreover, academic levels in 2000, university and master qualifications had another analysis. University qualification around 8%, on the other hand, master qualification a small number. Furthermore, in 2010 the university qualification increased to less than a fifth, meanwhile the master qualification boomed to over a third.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-06 tata 73 view
2024-06-06 tata 78 view
2024-06-06 tata 67 view
2023-08-08 tata 78 view
2023-08-05 tata 78 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The below charts demonstrate the average...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pore among adults from 2000 till 2010. For the most part, educational participa...
^^^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...g with different genders has noticeably rose throughout the years. Followed with ben...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the educational levels and stages. According to the bar charts illustration...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'charts'' or 'chart's'?
Suggestion: charts'; chart's
... and stages. According to the bar charts illustration of the educational partici...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... was among adult males than females. In contrast with 2008 & 2010 there had a noticeable...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bed up in comparison to the past years. As shown in the circle chart there’s a gre...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed up in comparison to the past years. As shown in the circle chart there’s a g...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, as for, for example, in contrast, no doubt, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 965.302439024 175% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60465116279 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27660781364 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531561461794 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 283.868780488 182% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2706532585 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7222222222 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7222222222 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453970788616 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137881479733 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129151031186 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317588153977 0.15604864568 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163868326943 0.0819641961636 200% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.