Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of fresh water. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While a plethora of people believe that they should have opportunities to consume fresh water as much as they like, others argue that governments should prohibit people from using the amount of fresh water without restraint. This essay will elaborate on both perspectives of the debate and explain why I am convinced of the former viewpoint.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons why the governments should take control of the use of freshwater. The first reason is preventing people from being a bad citizen. Naturally, when people have a chance to do things of their own volitions, some people may become selfish and abusive. Thus, the government should restrict not only to control the country’s water but also to help the residents become good people. The second reason is balancing the amount of water between each citizen. Nowadays, it can be seen that the society is mostly divided into three different classes, the upper, the working and the middle. If the use of freshwater is not strictly controlled, the upper class may use up to a large amount of water and the working may not be ale to get any as they are not able to afford.
On the other hand, there are a number of things which indicate that using fresh water freely is reasonable. Firstly, people are likely to use a suitable amount of fresh water to support their whole families. Take extended families as an example. As extended families include many generations, they are bound to have a large usage of water for activities like bathing, drinking, cooking, and so on. The more people in a home, the more water is consumed. Secondly, if people have the ability to consume water unrestrictedly, they may learn how to save money. As people have to pay for the water bill monthly or gradually, they are likely to know how to control their water usage in order to save the money for other expenses. As a result, this not only creates chances for people to use more water for their daily activities but also hits the books of how to spend money.
In conclusion, although there are reasons why people should be able to use freshwater as they like, by providing opportunities for people to use fresh water freely, they are able to support their families and learn how to spend money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | TLan168 | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | kevann | 67 | view |
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 61
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university What are the advantages and disadvantages for their study 73
- Some experts believe that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens any more satisfied To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people think that big companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72151898734 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51514368671 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455696202532 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0671456325 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.611111111 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475033785057 0.244688304435 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151746394523 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112416442718 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329039475669 0.151304729494 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461598007727 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.