Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree.
The important of E-books or modern technology replaced with newspapers and magazine which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influences of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favouring the both positive and negative impacts of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
Analyzing the statement and explaining further, the first and foremost reason behind is that the new generation totally depends upon new gadgets thats why it is good technology for them. They can easily update themselves with this technology. Another striking benefits in this regard is that, it is a share able content like if people get something interesting news on ebooks, so they can share with their friends by send a link they didnot go their for it. Categorically discussing, it cannot be ignored that the main reason behind this is that people do not need to carry a lot of books, because in modern era everyone has smartphones so it is very easy for them. They only need to search a thing which they want to know. For Example nowadays their are very tough compilation study. So, students have to read a lots of books for gaining their knowledge but some people don't have financially strong so they cannot afford the expenditure of books therefore it is good opportunity for them.
Probing ahead, one of the main underlying reason stem from the fact is that the older paper as well as uneducated persons who donot hane enoigh knowledge about modern devices, they have to facr numerous problem about the technology because they do not born in technology world, that's why they do not know how to tackle these things. Therefore it is very difficult for them. Moreover, ebooks and modern technology devices required power but if unfortunately people's mobile phones not charged then they donot able to read books so it is not good feature for them and one another thing is that individual can not get ful of reading from electronic devices as compare to books these big in size and people can easily concentrate on it. Apart from the reason mentioned above it can be clearly stated whyany are against of this trend.
To recapitulate, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of ebooks as well as modern technology are indeed too great to ignore.
- The reasons of evvironment pollution 84
- some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matter such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their wishes other people believe that it is important for 78
- Governemnt should funding to public transport to make it easy for public to travel but few people denied for this notion to what extent to do you agree or disagree 56
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 73
- some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matter such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their wishes other people believe that it is important for 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ration totally depends upon new gadgets thats why it is good technology for them. The...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...they want to know. For Example nowadays their are very tough compilation study. So, s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 812, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...lation study. So, students have to read a lots of books for gaining their knowledge bu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 872, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...gaining their knowledge but some people dont have financially strong so they cannot ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...e they do not born in technology world, thats why they do not know how to tackle thes...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...do not know how to tackle these things. Therefore it is very difficult for them. Moreover...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: big
...ronic devices as compare to books these big in size and people can easily concentrate on it...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s modern technology are indeed too great to ignore.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, another thing, apart from, for example, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 434.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93087557604 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63699988548 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534562211982 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.3975759421 49.4020404114 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145750754162 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417005742363 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046148187448 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941704265131 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182328442628 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.