The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that government must strengthen the punishments on driving offenses to reduce road accidents. In my point of view, I think the merits outweight the demerits for two reasons.
To start with, citizens are less likely to cause accidents when the law is stricter because residents do not want to lose money or go to prison. For instance, according to a research, after governments paid more taxes and money on punishment, there is a decrease in the number of car accidents from 70% to 47%. Moreover, when governments increase the taxes on regulations, they can have a chance to rebuild and improve the quality of the infrastructure. In addition, it will be more safety for inhabitants when using transportations. To exemplify, if more road barriers are invested, it will be less traffic accidents per year.
On the other hand, transportation education can also help citizens to broaden their mind and cognitive. In addition, forcing is not always a good idea that it may cause counter-productive with many side effects. The illustration for this is that one survey have already acertained a research between self-disciplined and forced regulations when residents involve in transportations that leads to the result that self-disciplined people are less likely to cause accidents again.
To sum up, as I have already mentioned both sides of the issue above, it has more than one solution to charge on transportation offenses such as reinforcing the rules or strengthen the knowledge of driving through education. However, I believe that the benefits of making the regulations more severe outweights its drawbacks.
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain But other say film should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The maps below show the changes to an art gallery floor plan in 2005 and the present day
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 56
- The graph shows the amount of fruit produced in four countries France Spain Germany Turkey from 1970 to 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...that one survey have already acertained a research between self-disciplined and forced reg...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, to start with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23664122137 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26259756311 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8278604283 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0877497340341 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325114896161 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458410909183 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0563505238958 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421258610383 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.