The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production.
The informative poster above gives an overview of how we can use renewable energy for residential level electricity generation.
On a high level, the whole process can be divided into two stages; the making of methane gas for industrial use, and the conversion of gas to electricity for home use.
Firstly, collection of compost requires human intervention, where leaves, food and organic waste needs to be gathered for fermentation in a steel tank in combination with a quarter level of water. The methane gas produced rises up and gets stored, moving slowly to a compressor, via thick pipes. As the name suggests, the output of this machine is compressed gas.
Two industry level machines take gas in for further processing. The gas is converted into mechanical energy followed by electrical energy by the combustion engine and generator, respectively. Housing societies can then make use of this environment friendly made electricity from its place of storage, a grid-station level battery.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- Many people believe that zoos have no purpose in today s world and should be closed What problems do zoos bring What are the alternatives to zoos if they are closed 92
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 84
- he charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summqrise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, so, then, as for, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30817610063 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03065048657 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679245283019 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1318835086 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0462679743957 0.215688989381 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219912250004 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336782667745 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0317476283031 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194130641183 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.