in today's world private companies rather than the government [ay for and conduct most scientific research. do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
Nowadays, many private companies are carrying out scientific research more than the government sector. It has some benefits like the government can divert money to some other divisions while the drawbacks of research ownership of private companies would be detrimental. Therefore the downside would outweigh the advantage.
On the one hand, there are many beneficial elements when the private companies put payment and conduct scientific research. Firstly, such companies would be able to spend large sums of money irrespective of governmental rules. governments can provide such an amount for other sectors like education, health, transport facilities and so on. Secondly, private companies could able to recruit scientists from any other nationalities, enhance their studies and collaborate with each other prudently. Whereas, every government have some limitations and target to customise people and utilise the products to some extent. For instance, the changing governance bodies and parties.
On the other hand, scientific research and the outcome would be devastating effects on nations to the long run. In other words, the company that owns the patent to do any research would be their own rights and reservation. They would manage the cost and prize for the outcome and that may lead to the economic dissimilarities in the country. Scientists from overseas would have their own rules and explore the innovative ideas and output in other countries which might lead to controversies to some extent. Moreover, the credibility and genuineness of the scientific research also would make some consequences inside the host country.
to sum up, it is destructive when private companies own the market of scientific research rather than the government and the disadvantage outweigh the merits to the core.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-03 | riyapatel30 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-26 | chinh11111 | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-25 | vialia | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | Blueberry123 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-03 | tamle | 78 | view |
- some people argue that regular games have more benefits for young people than modern ones to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays businesses face problems with new employees who just finished their education and lack some interpersonal skills such as the ability to work in a team What do you think is the main cause of the problem How can it be resolved 81
- the chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK cities between 1989 and 2009 82
- the chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 67
- the bar chart shows global sales in billion dollars of various types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...private companies would be detrimental. Therefore the downside would outweigh the advanta...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Governments
...ney irrespective of governmental rules. governments can provide such an amount for other se...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...nsequences inside the host country. to sum up, it is destructive when private ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52877697842 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90586262161 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539568345324 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9768548672 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.466666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267409761254 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100358490169 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890400427497 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207403291337 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088795945811 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...private companies would be detrimental. Therefore the downside would outweigh the advanta...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Governments
...ney irrespective of governmental rules. governments can provide such an amount for other se...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...nsequences inside the host country. to sum up, it is destructive when private ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52877697842 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90586262161 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539568345324 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9768548672 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.466666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267409761254 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100358490169 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890400427497 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207403291337 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088795945811 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.