In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays, people store knowledge on the internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
The advancement of technology has been offering countless potential for human’s development, especially in terms term of how humanity can retain and record information. This, however, sparks a heaty debate on whether, traditionally keeping information in written forms like books is better or utilising the internet for such knowledge recording is more optimal. They both have their merits; yet I believe that the latter later way of doing is potentially more beneficial.
Traditionally, before the advancement of technology and the Internet, ancient philosophers and scholars hadhas no other option but to keep track of their work and knowledge by transcribing it into books. This, in turn, has helped people to pass down such pristine and esteemed knowledge whereas without it, human development would have not been viable. Additionally, research has shown that school-aged children and even higher education students learn better and memorise for a longer period when reading from a physical book in comparison to its electronic counterpart. This is because booksbecause, books impart students with a sense students a sense of gravitas, which, in turn, help students student to focus better on the content of the book. In this sense, storing knowledge in books offers better outcomes outcome when it comes to learning. Nevertheless, my conviction is that using that, using books book for knowledge recording does come with risk including the deterioration of the physical books despite utmost bookkeeping. One of many prime examples for this is that countless numbers number of ancient books have has not been retrievable nor readable due to the conditions of the actual records such as missing pages, fading writings. Consequently, people have lost a good deal of knowledge that knowledge, that would have otherwise been passed down immaculately if the Internet were the storage of choice.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned reasons reasonings, I believe that electronic recording electronic way of recording is more viable. Storing knowledge on the internet means that it will be accessible within a click of a hand; thus, giving people the option to read despite their despite of their physical locations or times of the day. As a result, this might encourage people to read more as it eases the hassle of keeping an actual book everywhere they go. Additionally, retaining knowledge on the Internet means that such wisdom and valuable information will not be lost or damaged as the Internet offers an immeasurable storage without subjecting it to the subjecting to the corrosion of its surroundings or nor time. For instance, unlike differs from books, the Internet does not have a limit have limit in the number of pages nor its storing capacity; thus, people can record information up to millions and trillions of data without the fear of said information might be unretrievable one day. Moreover, by optimising the Internet for knowledge recording, people can effortlessly print such information and knowledge into physical books whenever and wherever they please, given that they have the appropriate tools and machinery and still always have a back-up of said information.
In conclusion, I believe that keeping that, keeping information and knowledge in an actual book does offer beneficial outcomes such as people learning learn better with physical books and there have not been many much viable ways of retaining information in the past but only using books. Nevertheless, utilising the Internet for such records and information keeping are more optimal as the Internet is infinite and the deterioration of the physical world has no effects upon its storing capacity and people can always make more copies copy of the information into physical books if they wish to.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-23 | MinhGoal1 | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | namanpluck | 90 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | duckymomokhongphailarapper | 87 | view |
| 2022-05-02 | Josie-e3 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | DIEU PHUONG | 76 | view |
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 87
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016
- All large companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Some think they should begin at at least 7 years old Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Companies use different ways to increase sales What different ways do companies use to increase sales What way is the most effective 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 453, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...nd even higher education students learn better and memorise for a longer period when r...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 805, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'outcomes'' or 'outcome's'?
Suggestion: outcomes'; outcome's
...toring knowledge in books offers better outcomes outcome when it comes to learning. Neve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...his might encourage people to read more as it eases the hassle of keeping an actua...
^^
Line 3, column 805, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'limited'.
Suggestion: limited
...the Internet does not have a limit have limit in the number of pages nor its storing ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 838, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...t have limit in the number of pages nor its storing capacity; thus, people can reco...
^^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to learn'
Suggestion: to learn
...ficial outcomes such as people learning learn better with physical books and there ha...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... outcomes such as people learning learn better with physical books and there have not ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 41.998997996 186% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3190.0 1615.20841683 197% => OK
No of words: 598.0 315.596192385 189% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33444816054 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94510247834 4.20363070211 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9502745026 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448160535117 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 985.5 506.74238477 194% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1929422179 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.894736842 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4736842105 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295140089589 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101215645659 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612937970791 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189591255134 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624869962551 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.