In the past, knowledge was contained in books. Nowadays, knowledge is uploaded to the internet. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
These days, the internet is overtaking books as a place to store knowledge. This brings more merits as reducing the use of papers and making it easier to access, surpassing the drawbacks.
Many argue that putting knowledge on the internet lowers the paper’s usage, reducing the number of trees abolished in the forest. Although it lowers forest logging considerably, knowledge on the internet is prone to plagiarism, disrespecting the author. However, this can be tackled by robust law enforcement regarding plagiarism. For instance, ever since the emergence of online journals in the past decades, most American researchers have not been required to print out their studies before presenting them in a forum. This impacts the declination of paper’s demand by almost half compared to the prior situation, which required printed copies of the journals, resulting in fewer trees being cut by almost a third.
Furthermore, it is more accessible for people to consume knowledge if uploaded on the internet than stored in books, allowing people to study more. Although it is easy for most people to access the internet, electricity is still the primary problem in some places, preventing people from accessing knowledge on the internet. However, this has been solved by the government prioritising building an infrastructure. For example, the number of psychology journals in most Indonesian universities has skyrocketed in the past decade. Many researchers acknowledged that this could be achieved by access to references through the internet, which allows them to finish their research twice faster than studying from books.
To conclude, limiting the paper’s usage and making it more accessible are the main plus points of putting knowledge on the internet compared to books. If possible, programs regarding this movement need to be sustained.
- The pie chart conveys the total of electricity units produced in France and Australia between 1980 and 2000 categorized by several source of energies 78
- Many people in the music business feel that illegal music sites on the internet are a serious threat to the industry and more should be done to prevent them from operating To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 62
- In many countries schools have several problems with student s behaviour What do you think are causes of this what solutions can you suggest 73
- The demand for food is increasing worldwide Why has it happened What measures could the international community take to improve the situation 78
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "required printed" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'printing' or 'to be printed'.
Suggestion: printing; to be printed
... to the prior situation, which required printed copies of the journals, resulting in fe...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...twice faster than studying from books. To conclude, limiting the paper’s usage ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, still, third, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46527777778 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92110896821 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565972222222 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2735131319 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.428571429 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206606352278 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730055598244 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397387614412 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124902804273 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022425158482 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.