More and more people no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news . They get news about the world through the internet. Is this a positive or negative development?
During the era of modern technology breakthroughs, people stay up-to-date by acquiring news from the Internet rather than newspapers and TV programmes. It seems to be a corroborative shift and this essay will submit evidence to this idea.
First and foremost, Internet-based news appears to be superior to newspapers and TV in several aspects. While reading newspapers or watching TV news takes lots of time and is only available in specific periods, people get access to online news by their mobile devices, which is always portable and at their disposal. Moreover, news websites adapt the content from diverse sources, together with toxic materials censorship using filter systems. Also, most of them are free-charging, or have a reasonable fee policy. As a result, people are capable of saving their time and budget for other tasks, updating the latest news as soon as possible from accurate and reliable resources. Another notable point is the captivating appearance of Internet-based news platforms, which boosts the desire to read news much better than newspapers or TV.
In addition, the development of online news usage is more environmentally beneficial than newspapers. It is acknowledged that printing consumes many papers, but most printed materials are not properly and thoroughly recycled. Papers are made of wood from logging; what’s more, reforestation policies are not well implemented, leading to the detrimental shortage of forests, and negatively affecting the environment. The adaptation of online news platforms minimizes the use of paper-based newspapers; hence, lessening the ratio of newly produced and wasted papers.
To encapsulate, that Internet news replacing newspapers and TV programmes are prerequisite to the mutual developing trend of the global. Its increasing usage does not only promote news reading, but benefits environmental status as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-17 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | Kha Linh | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 70 | view |
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years 78
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- More and more people no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'materials'' or 'material's'?
Suggestion: materials'; material's
...om diverse sources, together with toxic materials censorship using filter systems. Also, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59930313589 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1050242648 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630662020906 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7711759124 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.785714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338810900382 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104548732213 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743843839822 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180950324451 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517352003061 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.