Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. But others think taking part in individual sports is better, like swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that participating in playing team sports, such as soccer, is more beneficial. While others think it is better to take part in individual, such as swimming. From my perspective, I believe that participating in sports that require teamwork is better.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why taking part in individual sports can be beneficial. Firstly, people can focus on themselves when learning to participate in individual sports, which will make them not need to mind other people and can help them feel more comfortable. In contrast, taking part in team sports can make people have to do things as a team and not individually. Moreover, some people like doing individual work instead of engaging in team sports so they will feel uncomfortable when forced to work in a team.
On the other hand, I believe that it is better to take part in sports which are played in teams such as basketball or football. To begin with, it will be fun and people can make more friends when they play teamwork. Moreover, playing in teams can make the relationship between people improve and better. Finally, people can help each other when they join team sports. Contrary to this, individual sports can be very boring, and if people face an accident, they will not ask for help from others when engaging individual sports.
In conclusion, although individual sports can bring people many benefits, it seems to me that participating in team sports can be more beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | horae.zh | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | Nguyễn Ninh | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | dorae | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-26 | quytnee | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than huma 89
- The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1998 and in 2008 78
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90039840637 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74309081684 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 176.041082164 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470119521912 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6485311386 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6153846154 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353325679503 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157531624701 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811441113096 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236968813913 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479740135361 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.