The graph below shows the percentage of people in the different age groups who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain.
The line graph indicates the proportion of people split by four age brackets who went to the cinema once a month in the UK from 1984 to 2000.
Overall, while the attendance of cinema goers in all four age groups increased significantly, 15-to-24-year-olds were the most frequent attendees of the cinema during the period surveyed.
In 1984, approximately 18% of those aged 15 to 24 went to the cinema once a month, being the highest cinema attendance of all age brackets. It is followed by the 7-14 age group and 25-35 age group with their figures at 10% and 4% respectively. Meanwhile, almost no one aged 35 or over went to the cinema. Over the following 16 years, the rate of attendance of all age brackets went up gradually.
By 2000, there was a threefold increase in the proportion of those from 15 to 24 years old, reaching its peak of roughly 60%, which doubled the figures of 7-to-14-year-olds and 25-to-35-year-olds. In contrast, the cinema attracted about 15% of cinema goers who were aged 35 or plus at the end of the period
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-24 | thaocbh | 82 | view |
| 2023-01-24 | thaocbh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | thanhnga285 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | thanhnga285 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Han Duyen | 73 | view |
- In some countries men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 73
- some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give opinions 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in the different age groups who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain 73
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away What are the Causes of this and what problems can this cause 84
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71038251366 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08168622523 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9443895736 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292715464575 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151468980764 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922800465541 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196027760784 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102439215316 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.