The treat of nuclear power weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.
The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Since the evolution of nuclear industry, the world has entered a new page of development and energy. These days, nuclear weapons become a serious threat to the world peace. Otherwise, exploiting nuclear energy provides a clean, cheap and abundant source of energy.
Nuclear weapons are known to provide cheap and clean energy. Firstly, nuclear weapon generates more electricity than any other available option on Earth. As a result, more people will avail electricity at cheaper rates which could bring development to our populations. There is ample evidence to suggest nuclear plant under controlled environment generates less nuclear waste. For example, power plants in developing countries not only provide electricity but also help in raising people from poverty which in turn helps small scale businesses to flourish. Sadly, this task of providing cheap and efficient energy can’t be achieved with other available energy plants. Therefore, nuclear powerplant is the best available to our planet
Finally, since nuclear powerplant is low cost to operate and a reliable source of energy. in other words, public expenditure of a country can be drastically brought down for providing day to day activities and this can be utilized in other sectors. similarly, we have enough deposits of uranium. For instance, a study published by W.H.O in 2003 found that people who live near nuclear plants don't have any chronic diseases. So it is clear that nuclear weapons are superior.
To conclude, nuclear weapons outweigh the disadvantages and they should be promoted for a better living for humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | ÁNH HANDSOME | view | |
| 2022-09-16 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | Luisjackiet | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | tungpham | 73 | view |
- Social and modern trends are difficult to follow these days and it s widely believed that they primarily exist just to make the living more colorful especially online Some people believe that we shouldn t follow them and that we should live in what we are 73
- With growing population in cities more and more people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollutions and housing problems To what extent do you agree to disagree with this statement 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harmful to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...perate and a reliable source of energy. in other words, public expenditure of a co...
^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
... this can be utilized in other sectors. similarly, we have enough deposits of uranium. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: O
... For instance, a study published by W.H.O in 2003 found that people who live near...
^
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hat people who live near nuclear plants dont have any chronic diseases. So it is cle...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, similarly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37051792829 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6855190388 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621513944223 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1153803893 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320899819194 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124851857805 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878822829242 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203302068699 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661645761754 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.