Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same job. What problems this causes? What are the solutions?
Finding the appropriate job is one of the most important issues for all people of different age groups. In this regard, younger and older people are competitors to fill vacancy positions. In this essay, the problems of this subject have been evaluated and finally, some solutions are presented.
To begin with, one of the most problem that will be occurred in case of using older people more than younger is related to have a lot of unemployed young people after a few years. Certainly, it has significant effect on the different social aspects and will be led to catastrophic repercussion. For example, the mentioned young people will not be able to provide living cost for themselves and as a result will not desire to marriage. As a faraway consequence of this problem, birth rate will be diminished and society move toward being older and older.
As a second problem, nowadays, the majority jobs need to excited and motivated people with strong passion to create changes and improve difficulties. Therefore, the quality of a job that has been done by older people it is not comparable with younger. Honestly, it seems motivation is essential factor to perform a job in the best way. For instance, it is not imaginable the result of making a road that just older people has worked on it.
There are some solutions that have presented in precedence. Firstly, one of the best solutions is using older people, simultaneously with younger to have the benefits of both required factors, experience, and motivation by focusing on younger and put the older people as a head of them. In this way, the concern of employer to reduction of risks in case of critical job will be eliminated. Secondly, the stronger and reliable insurance should be created toward support of older people that lose their job and finally put some serious rules for directors as a barrier to easy dismissal of older staff.
In conclusion, as described, using more older people instead of younger will lead to excessive trouble and need to consider some rules and treatment to reduce it.
- what do you think about technology in education what are the pores and cones 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 61
- the chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2019 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays many of families have both parents working Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children while others think childcare centers provide the best care Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'older' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: older
...f. In conclusion, as described, using more older people instead of younger will lead to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, honestly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88857142857 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7164517673 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497142857143 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3358560496 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9375 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375566147857 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12953058433 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663091601603 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223915146271 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298051114285 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.