The bar chart showed the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments (violin, guitar, piano, drums) in 3 years 2005, 2010, 2015.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of young students who played four different musical instruments including violin, guitar, piano and drums in 2005, 2010 and 2015.
In general, it is apparent that guitar was the most popular at school while drum and violin were the least preferred instruments. Additionally, the figures for guitar and piano also exhibited an upward trend throughout the studied period.
In particular, school children always favored guitar learning over the other instruments. In 2005, the percentage of students who studied the guitar was 11%, which increased by twofold 5 years later and reached a peak at about 27% in 2015. There were also many pianists, with nearly the same number of children favoring it in 2005. The gap widened between guitar and piano fromroughly 1% in 2005 to about 3% in 2010 and finally at around 2% in the final year.
Contrastingly, drum and violin remained at relatively same levels throughout the mentioned years. While drum was at the bottom in 2005 and 2010 with only 6% of the participants, there were also not many violinists, at about 7.5%. However, the ranks reversed in 2015 with drum topping violin by a mere 0.5% difference.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufacturedThe diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 74
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast food 56
- 23 7 2022 Many people find it hard to balance their work with other parts of their lives What are the reasons for this How this problem can be overcome 84
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve Others however believe that these problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take actions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The three pictures below show three different kinds of bridges 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, while, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0303030303 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70241194177 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6600825205 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440867009409 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163804715781 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150867221863 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288442534194 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188253928994 0.0819641961636 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, while, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0303030303 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70241194177 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6600825205 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440867009409 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163804715781 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150867221863 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288442534194 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188253928994 0.0819641961636 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.