As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction.To what extent do you agree with such a procedure. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least 250 word
Currently, with the advancement of science and technology, cloning of humans has been becoming possibility. This concept is no longer science fiction, despite the horrors to many a person to get accepted with this issue. The cloning of animals has been occurring for several years up to now, which has now opened up the possibility into human beings. Although there are clear benefits to humankind of cloning to provide spare body parts, I believe it raises a number of worrying morality issues.
To begin with my stating, due to breakthroughs in medical science and improving diets, people are living much longer than in the past, which has brought with the certain problems. To the first sight of that admit, as people age, their organs can be used up, therefore, they need to be replaced. For example, if humans were cloned, their organs could then be useful for those of sick people. Thus, cloning would help in increasing the living rate as well as improving the life standard of people.
Nonetheless, human cloning is not coming with a reasonable and acceptable budgets. That could be the reason for which few people cannot afford. If they can accumulate money, they can also take benefits from cloning but can create somehow huge social problems. As a result, there are religious communities that strictly disapprove of cloning. It would involve creating other human beings and then eventually killing them in order to use their organs, which could be argued is murder. This is obviously a sin according to religious texts. Through those such mentioned above, to my own views, I strongly admit that cloning humans has caused more than a single issue to the whole society and the private livings.
In conclusion, in spite of bringing many advantages to human beings in terms of providing alternate organs or other dangerous task-replacements, cloning would definitely horrify almost people those who are living with morality and standard of religious texts. In my brief, I suppose that the balance of using and applying this such kind of technology must be in handling rightly to avoid the damages into the people’s significant living values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-16 | Luisjackiet | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Koi | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | cleee | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | tung0303 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays a lot of people change the way of smoking from conventional cigarettes to electronic ones Discuss advantages and disadvantages of this statement 73
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that these entertainments are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the bene 56
- Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to lead a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06741573034 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63489734232 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558988764045 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0340368578 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.117647059 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265296243004 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795765442354 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536171185799 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161243947179 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203620577533 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.