Environmental damage is a problem in most countries. What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility?
Protection of the environment has become a controversial issue nowadays. I believe that humans could be mainly attributable to the phenomenon and we should also be responsible for any affects of the development.
There are two main reason behind the negative impacts upon the environment, which are the invasion and industrializing to natural areas of human beings. The first cause of the phenomenon is that manufacture of goods and services. These operations demand natural resources and materials, which contributes greatly to the deterioration of the environment. This is because the production process to produce these inputs often leaves large amount of carpon footprint, waste and emission which are the main culprits of pollution. More importantly, overpopulation also places the ecosystem at risk. The increase of population silmutaneously boosts the demand for food, shelter and relevant infrastructure and facilities that requires the constant expansion of cities, habitable land. The movement steadily jeorpadise the natural envionment by causing loss of habitats for wild animals and vegetation, thereby exacurbating environmental issues.
The responsibility for the deterioration of the environment should fall on individuals, business owners and the authorities. People, in general, regularly favor the convinience over the harms on our world. The instinct subsequently results in increase in use of plastic packaging, widespread of fast-fashion and consumerism. The lifestyle encourages the disposal of artificial compounds, which are dangerous to the environment. Another responsible party for the damage of the natural world are tycoons who crave for maximizing their profit and neglect their impacts on the nature. For example, some greedy firm’s owners can go so far to dump wastes directly to land and water bodies, in order to avoid processing the disposal which can cost them certain amount of money. Finally, political leaders who may overlook the preservation of the environment because of corruption or lack of duty that they should be in charge. These individuals are the ones who contribute the most of the degration of nature in recent years.
In sum, development of industrialized areas and rise of population are threatening the planet. Ordinary people, business owners and governments should together hold responsible for destroying the nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | đam kim doan | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | ttltpttdc | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-13 | Kaito Mori | 11 | view |
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Interviews form the basic criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and that there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- People are never satisfied and always want more In what ways is this a good thing and in what ways is this a bad thing 89
- Some people believe that children should be taught about recycling and avoiding waste at home while others believe children should learn this at school Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eby exacurbating environmental issues. The responsibility for the deterioration of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, may, so, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69382022472 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24147444985 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2162952425 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.684210526 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7368421053 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63157894737 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162486101236 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437248897665 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462934276807 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911578771081 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534088052354 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.