Government should support care vs finance for retired people while others believe that they should save money when they get older. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Whether retired individuals should reiceive money and medical support from the authorities or should they save income for later use in life, is a controversial issue. Both ideas will be elaborated below.
It is understandable why some people advocate to the view that receipt of assistance from governments. First, workers already contribute to the posperity of their society through the tax system when they are working. Therefore, retirees should be entitled for support from their governments when they are unable to work. Another justification for governmental support for the retired people is that it would encourage working individuals to dedicate their energy and time for development and wealth of their nation. By aiding retired senior citizens, governments would make sure that all their good citizens will have a decent life with their basic needs fullfilled. This gives people, who are inhabiting in their countries, a sense of security.
On the other hand, working people who are good-hearted and privileged, have a tendency to have savings for their later life. Some people believe that they can look after themselves when they turn older and if they take part of medical services, money, food from governments, the other less advantaged would stand a higher chance of struggling in life. Likewise, there are individuals who make a good living, they therefore deny the benefits entitlement from the well-fare system. These individuals often work at managerial roles, or specialized professions, which allow them to have a good source of salary. This enables them to induce more luxurious lifestyle without help from governments.
In sum, I believe that both viewpoints have their own merits. However, I personally side with the idea that wage-earners can get support from governments.
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 78
- Interviews form the basic criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and that there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- When talking about success we often think of people who are rich or famous In your opinion what are the qualities that characterise a successful person Why do you think these should be the criteria 89
- If a product is good or it meets people s needs people will buy it So advertising is unnecessary and no more than entertainment Agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays people use bicycles less as a form of transport Why is that What can we do to encourage people to use bicycles more 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 433, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'benefits'' or 'benefit's'?
Suggestion: benefits'; benefit's
... a good living, they therefore deny the benefits entitlement from the well-fare system. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, likewise, look, so, therefore, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40636042403 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86465452574 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590106007067 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2606810285 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295085471202 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935802163425 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849322129508 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181864168555 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633073761939 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.