Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some people think it is necessary, but others hold that it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
It is common that huge organizations pay higher wages for directors than those normal workers. While some people believe it is reasonable, others think otherwise. This essay will elaborate on both views, and explain why directorial roles should obtain more salaries.
On the one hand, there are reasons why directors can earn higher salary than normal workers. The first reason is that it motivates workers to work harder and improve their productivity. Luxurious payment for directors provides normal employees with a role model and sends the message to these individuals that they can make a decent income when they are promoted to managerial positions. Additionally, It is thought that important leaders at organizations exhibits highly valued skills and qualities, holding the key to the survival and growth of organizations. In order to maintain the service of standout individuals, companies have to reward them with much higher salary. This is because the labor market has become increasingly competitive, in case high profile workers are distatisfied with their income, they may seek another company with better payment. Loss of the precious human resources would pose a threat to the managament of organizations. Therefore, paying more to directors is a worthy strategy to encourage other staff and keep leading people.
On the other hand, paying lower wage for workers than directors appears unjustified for the less significant employees. Even though the implications individual ordinary staff has on companies or organizations are vague, they constitute the major workforce in the establishments. This means that their impacts as a whole is much more significant than their high-ranking counterparts. If employees acknowledge the fact that their income is considerably different from the leaders, wage-earners who receive modest income may go on strike or even get involved in legislative acts against their organizations. Another downside of income disparity in organizations is low morale and loss of momentum amongst the workforce. Workers might be discouraged to make more contribution and the turnover rate would increase as a result. Huge income difference between directors and workers thus have negative impacts on normal workers' attitudes to their places of work.
In sum, higher payment for directors acts as a stimulus for general workers' performance and sustain their valuable knowledge and skills, albeit it takes its toll on perceptions of workers towards their working environment. I concur with the view that merits of the movement would eclipse its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-18 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-13 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | devanshgera8@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | devanshgera8@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 73
- News coverage about violent crimes frightens people and encourages criminals Therefore some believe that this type of news should not be reported in newspapers or shown on TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- To succeed in business one needs to learn and know math To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...irectors acts as a stimulus for general workers performance and sustain their valuable ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...environment. I concur with the view that merits of the movement would eclipse its...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2204.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53768844221 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99895186357 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575376884422 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3716238663 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167900196736 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530618810471 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503998731126 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109542592712 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501560449144 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.