The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones. What problems can this create? What are some solutions?
Age discrimination among applicants has been causing headaches to all relevant bodies who join the recruitment market. This essay attempts to shed light on some potential consequences of this problem and propose some viable solutions to resolve it.
Age discrimination, in terms of consequences, causes people to be more vulnerable to unemployment. On the one hand, generation conflicts may occur violently stemming from age favoritism. To be specific, young-age favoritism may ignite the fear of being replaced and unemployed among the old, and therefore, they may negatively act against younger applicants by isolating and not sharing their working experience. On the other hand, the cognition of old age as a disadvantage may put young employees into burned-out status. Since they have to work and improve themselves as fast as possible to get a permanent job before they are considered old applicants, many of them have no option but to devote all their physical and mental health to work, which may be exhausting and discouraging.
To combat this worrying issue, the following feasible steps should be taken. Firstly, recruiters should have rules to avoid direct rivalries between applicants of different age groups. For example, recruiters should not let any candidates know the age of the other since old candidates may blame for their age disadvantage if they fail. Secondly, corporations should facilitate improvement for staff to meet the need of their positions. By applying internal training courses, not only employers can improve the productivity of their businesses but also employees may be protected from age competition as their experience can outweigh their age.
In short, there are serious repercussions attributable to this negative phenomenon, and it is crucial that the aforementioned measures be implemented to deal with this problem.
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 89
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 78
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 73
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Australia between 1995 and 2005 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46875 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1298400019 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628472222222 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1424646 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.153846154 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131107888986 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048785718218 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048555414925 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966935661188 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453244448127 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.