In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays, people store knowledge on the internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In today's society, the Internet has become the choice of most people for knowledge storage instead of books like they used to do. Although this development has posed some threats, from my perspective, the benefits it yields still outweigh those drawbacks.
In the opinion of some people, storing knowledge on the Internet appears disadvantageous, for it brings about certain drawbacks. A downside that needs mentioning is that the information reliability is not well guaranteed. Things posted on the Internet are usually not censored by any department specialized in information verification, which leads to the rise of fake or inaccurate news. Therefore, social media users would have difficulty differentiating between true and false information if it were not for their alertness. Furthermore, the Internet has also paved the way for the emergence of copyright infringements. Lots of websites are releasing pirated works on digital platforms to attract viewers and make extra profits illegally, causing a loss of a lot of money and effort for original content creators.
However, I believe that knowledge stored on the Internet has more significant advantages than the drawbacks mentioned. One of those is the diversity of sources. People can search for information from many web engines such as Google, Firefox or Microsoft Edge, and they can gain a wide range of knowledge from various websites with a couple of mouse clicks. This diversity is aligned with the availability of the sources, as anyone with an Internet connection can access information immediately anywhere, which is cheaper and more time-saving than looking for the same amount of knowledge from printed books. Another beneficial point that knowledge stored on the Internet brings about is that it can be kept in different formats. Compared to a book whose information is presented chiefly as texts and static visuals, including graphs and pictures, the Internet allows knowledge to be held in some other more vivid forms (videos and audio), which is suitable for auditory and visual learners, who tend to learn well via podcasts and videos instead of long paragraphs of texts.
In conclusion, despite its apparent disadvantages, storing knowledge on the Internet certainly seems more advantageous to people using it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-23 | MinhGoal1 | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | namanpluck | 90 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | duckymomokhongphailarapper | 87 | view |
| 2022-05-02 | Josie-e3 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | DIEU PHUONG | 76 | view |
- Cycling has many benefits yet in some countries there is a decrease in the number of people using bicycles as their main form of transportation Why is it happening Give suggestions on how to encourage people to use bicycles again 77
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability while others believe that there are more important factors involved in success in sports Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them Discuss both of these views and give your opinion 63
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37883008357 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97385299678 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593314763231 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9842521969 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.733333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309136117106 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100689324747 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093926385259 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2080733816 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741576420802 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.