Some believe that people are naturally born leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today’s society, numerous people believe being the host country of a global sports event can provide a lot of benefits. However, the rest of the population considers it unnecessary. In this essay, both views of this belief will be discussed.
To begin the essay, the pros to become the host of worldwide sports events will be clarified. Firstly, major attention can be earned when the nation becomes the organizer. One of the most common hobbies people have is sports, especially football. Due to that fact, being the host can get numerous visitors and tourists and the tourism industry can develop. Furthermore, a huge number of videos can be shared all around the world. Secondly, with the increased number of visitors, the economy can rise faster. The residents can open a small shop so that they can sell some sort of things. This could support the economy to go up.
However, on the other hand, others believe being the host does bring a number of drawbacks. The first clue was climes. With a major number of people suddenly coming to the country for international events, the percentage getting involved in a robbery is higher than before. This might lead to a lack of safety in the dweller’s life. Nevertheless, in the world these days, there are a lot of nations just building luxurious and vast stadiums for events. However, after the sports competitions, these stadiums will be unused, which means they are wasted. Moreover, the costs to build are from the residents’ taxes. If the nations built too much, the economy would not be developed but decreased.
To sum up, being the host does have both negative and positive sides. In my point of view, I believe even though they can get numerous risks, they do earn a number of benefits to support the country’s developments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-29 | Tramtrr.21 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | Anonymous | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | Harman97 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-24 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | phuong anh nguyen chin chin | 73 | view |
- Some say that in today s world the value of humanities has been eclipsed by the necessity of preparing for specific wealth producing careers such as medicine Discuss whether you think there is a role in today s changing world for study of the humanities 69
- Nowadays many young people leave home at an early age to either study or work in another city.To what extent do you agree? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experiences. 77
- How widely do you think the problems that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 85
- What are the pros and cons of staying connected on social media for 24 hours a day. 72
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops.What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ieve being the host country of a global sports event can provide a lot of benefits. Ho...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, sort of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87581699346 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60158634821 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575163398693 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.415653911 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.0476190476 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5714285714 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141378955489 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398791730884 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392475208004 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946752604859 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213464319207 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.