some movies are serious and others are to amuse and entertain.
It is convienced that several movies are made for attracking viewers to think while others have purposes to console the spectator. Personally, I tend to choose films which desires to entertain the audience that is supported by some reasons.
In the one hand, the crucial reason is many people want to refresh their mind by watch the movie. It is because they have a few hard activities along the week that trigger stress for them. As proof, many office workers go to cinema for enjoying a funny film with their partners caused by bored feelings which rise in their body so they intend to reduce it. As a result, a few persons prefer to buy the ticket of comedy rather than a serious film.
Nevertheless, there are some disadvantages to keep in line for choosing the tense movie. Firstly, lots of people feel waste their money for something that make them overthinking. It is caused by the movie would bring out many questions for them so they finish it with a weird feeling. To illustrate, some movies in cinema have an unclear ending because the producer want to herd the critical-humaned spectator for creating the best ending itself but for several people, it only issues disappointed. Thus, the tense film is encouraging an uncomfort situation which is a circumstance that a few persons did not expect it. Next, it would be an unuseful activity. As a reason, many citizens reach the movie theater to entertain themselves through the movie which they have choosen for decreasing their worried but it would be useless because of the movie make them to think heavier. For instance, a well-riddled film has a chance for pushing the audience to think with an unusual way that could causes headache. Therefore, it is not the good idea to lower the anxiety that everyone desire by its way.
To sum up where my track, every single person has the favourite movie that they usually want to enjoy in different circumstances so they have to make a good decision for avoiding a ridiculous situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-20 | Wulan | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | Huyle121212 | 92 | view |
| 2016-09-22 | kajal A. Patel | 61 | view |
| 2016-09-22 | kajal A. Patel | 72 | view |
- The charts below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 61
- In the future more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad no holiday 11
- Airport visitors 2007 2012 Millions of travelers per year 78
- The table shows the cost of water in 5 cities in Australia 73
- The line charts above representate the number of Australian coming out to Japan US China and India for the last twenty two years specifically from 1990 to 2012 It is measured in percentage 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence that is supported by some reasons. In the one hand, the crucial reason is m...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 991, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...to think with an unusual way that could causes headache. Therefore, it is not the good...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on for avoiding a ridiculous situation.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78550724638 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64767338113 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542028985507 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6783403507 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149978747463 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475809096517 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564153820442 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989526559783 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736009582844 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.