Some young people like to copy the behaviour and clothes of famous people today. Why might this be the case? What problems can it cause?
In this modern era, it is clear that more and more millenials generation imitate well-known person's lifestyle, including their manners and their trendy fashions. There are several causes and considerable effects for this phenomenon, which I will elaborate more below.
Regarding the causes, the massive influence of social media creates youngsters mimicking to emulate the attitude of popular societies. It is clear that in digital platform, there is no border (norms and values) for all ages to access it. To illustrate, the videos shared on internet are lately categorised as unethical contents which turn out to be common behaviour for adolescents. Furthermore, most celebrities ranging from 12 to 25's rise the disapperance of authentic costumes as public trend centres are tendentiously mirrored by current teenagers, in order to flaunt what their lifestyle looks like. In other words, if each teenagers dress up in renowned brands, they will eliminate the ethics of inherited clothings worn in specially solemn events.
Conversely, this view might show some effects that certain cultures might face the crisis of the preserved behaviours when more and more teenagers lose their interest to such principles. As a result, their character would most likely resemble foreign ones, without considering the wonderful of diversity. In addition, the youngsters buy compulsive modern items that might encumber their parents. These days, there is s strong desire to have branded ones and commit illegal actions such as stealing and robbery. Sadly, not only do they earn bad record, but this also could tarnish the bad family’s reputation.
In conclusion, the causes of duplicating the renowned people amongst today’s society may include negative digital media influence and peers-ambitious recognition. Meanwhile, the reasonable effects are considered the disappearance of authentic customary as well as shopping addiction.
- Many first year university students discover after they have started their course that their chosen subjects do not suit them Why does this happen What can be done to ensure that students can choose a suitable subject 90
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 90
- Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 89
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 89
- More and more people want to own items such as cars clothing and other things that are made by famous brands Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...illenials generation imitate well-known persons lifestyle, including their manners and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'rise' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'rises'.
Suggestion: rises
...most celebrities ranging from 12 to 25s rise the disapperance of authentic costumes ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6323024055 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9136111259 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680412371134 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0693775937 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.071428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151806301675 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399985644527 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388594651747 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788492924539 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019816625649 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...illenials generation imitate well-known persons lifestyle, including their manners and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'rise' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'rises'.
Suggestion: rises
...most celebrities ranging from 12 to 25s rise the disapperance of authentic costumes ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6323024055 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9136111259 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680412371134 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0693775937 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.071428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151806301675 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399985644527 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388594651747 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788492924539 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019816625649 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.