In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move out of large cities and into regional areas. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages?
There is a widely-held view among people regarding the governance policy of relocating companies and factories into regions. Although this decision might have certain drawbacks, I would argue that these negative influences are overshadowed by constructive ones.
On the one hand, there is undoubtedly true that moving businesses into local regions might, in the short term, act as a precursor for unemployment in large towns. This quitting process occurs due to the fact that various employees find the new locations of their existing companies too far away from their homes. Hence, it requires them to change their residents if they opt to continue working for that company, which consists of complex procedures for not only themselves but also their belongings.
On the other hand, I believe that the disadvantages pale in comparison with accompanying advantages for the environment, individuals and society. The first striking reason is that the shifting would act as a stimulus to alleviate environmental problems, which are already remarkable in major metropolises on a global scale. This situation happens due to the combination of overpopulation and the exploitation of environmental resources in the long term, leading to the landscape and the water source’s contamination, or in other words, dramatic environmental pollution. For instance, it is recorded that ever since Samsung factories were moved from Hanoi to Bac Giang, the environmental index of the Vietnamese capital significantly increased, achieving sustainable development gradually. Furthermore, relocating of a multiple factories and businesses would create jobs for rural workers, which is an essential need in regional areas. The local ones will be given a chance to enhance their average salary as well as be boosted to devote more time to study and research to become competitive in the labor market. This would grant local people comprehensive personal development after being illuminated their minds and thinking, which would stimulate the area’s socioeconomic vitality particularly and the country’s economic progression in general.
In conclusion, it seems sensible to me that even though the government’s policy of transferring corporations to the rural might start the meltdown of employment for a while, the lucrative benefits still prevail on the potential ones.
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- More and more people are no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news They get news from about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 84
- In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider as it valuable experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What are your opinion on this? 78
- The increasing use of mobile phones and computer has had a negative effect on young people s writing and reading skills Do you agree or disagree 84
- Many countries now have people from different culture and ethnic group What is the reason for this Is it a positive or negative development 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, there is undoubtedly true that moving businesses into local regions might, in ...
^^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y themselves but also their belongings. On the other hand, I believe that the di...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, regarding, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in general, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62921348315 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21292326387 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623595505618 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.3522947589 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.153846154 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5384615385 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128653650639 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433650214292 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039882212019 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660624934978 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027116945485 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, there is undoubtedly true that moving businesses into local regions might, in ...
^^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y themselves but also their belongings. On the other hand, I believe that the di...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, regarding, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in general, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62921348315 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21292326387 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623595505618 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.3522947589 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.153846154 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5384615385 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128653650639 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433650214292 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039882212019 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660624934978 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027116945485 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.