Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people’s reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely acknowledged that the use of computers and mobile devices to communicate might have a strong negative impact on the reading and writing skills of the youth. From my perspective, while using electric devices to communicate can be beneficial, the drawbacks of this should be taken into consideration.
On the other hand, there are myriad reasons why younger using computers and mobile phones can be beneficial, the most significant of which are various applications and enhancing social communication skills. With regard to the first idea, with technological development, the use of applications to serve for studying is a matter of course for young people. For example, millions of juvenile people using the Grammarly application were recorded in 2017, it is considered a renowned software to serve for improving reading and writing skills in recent years. As far as the second point is concerned, using computers and mobile devices can improve social communication. For instance, young generations tend to proactively take part in some groups on social media with the aim of exchanging hard problems and making new friends.
On the other hand, the aforementioned problems can have some demerits, liked to tend to using shorthand words and depending on applications. when it comes to the former, the use of shorthand words is a tendency of young people these days. For example, teenagers love sending a formal email to someone full of shorthand words, the reader will be inferred that we do not spend a respectful attitude toward them. In terms of the latter, more and more young generations depend on software a lot. For instance, when teenagers are not actually know how to deal with a hard problem, they will use software to tackle these problems, which makes them more and more lazy to find a solution.
In conclusion, I am inclined to believe that despite the positive effects that using electric devices can exert, the negative implications should not be underestimated.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-16 | Mollymaul | 75 | view |
2024-05-18 | lalo | 56 | view |
2023-11-14 | wholemilk | 84 | view |
2023-06-23 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
2023-05-18 | jessie7777 | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 73
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 73
- the diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 73
- Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time Is this a positive or negative development 89
- the diagram below shows how instant noddles are manufactured 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 825, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g hard problems and making new friends. On the other hand, the aforementioned pr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...nd words and depending on applications. when it comes to the former, the use of shor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95676434948 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7007730922 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.769230769 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281670164978 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986820693817 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064140196684 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156555501571 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653954096905 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.