Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People argue about whether to work in teams or individually. With me, I believe that both aspects of working are beneficial, because each way of working will bring us many different skills.
Working in a team brings to us lots of utility for each member in that group. They can work with their partner to improve their skills or fix a mistake in their group. They can also help shorten the duration of the work than when they do it alone. Team work also helps us coordinate and collaborate with teammates and achieve harmony with everyone. It can also help us have more confidence to express opinions in front of many people. For instance, during Covid-19, if one researched a vaccine, it could take months or even years. However, with the support of teammates, that time was greatly shortened and the vaccine has been transported everywhere and saved many lives
However, individual work also brings many benefits. It helps us recognize ourselves: know who we are and what we can do. Working independently gives people more responsibility for themselves and what they do. Moreover, they have space to develop themselves independently rather than in a group. For example, many millionaires in the world work alone and succeed without help or support. When they succeed, they find their team to develop that and make it more complete.
In conclusion, teamwork and independent work help us develop more skills and experience.
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days 67
- Many people use social media every day to keep in touch with friends and get social news Do you think the advantages of it outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The line graph shows the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016 67
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 56
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...cause each way of working will bring us many different skills. Working in a team brings to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99581589958 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70772402615 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539748953975 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7299347362 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9333333333 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137686769269 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587463281765 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03778837577 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874730431523 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473698677925 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.