The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Society is formed with many layers; it has different structure. Normally, every society has two parties: people and government authority. From development point of view of society, people have equal role to make prosperous society; they ask questions to the authority related to their well-being. Also, questioning by people to the authority does not always help to enhance well-being of the society. However, people's question can enhance the well-being of the society. There are multiple evidences and examples explained below to emphasize the people's role enhancing the prosperity oof society.
Nepal, a South Asian country which has lots of natural resources, is developing country. People of society wants development (in education, health, infrastructure, etc.); what they did is they started questioning authority for their enhancement of well-being. people, who were suffering from many hardships, started conversation with the authority of different field for the seriousness, many projects which can assist to enhance their prosperity. By this process, In 1910 they got schools in their own place, hospitals and industry which helps to enhance economic status of the society. the prosperity of society enhanced when people question authority.
2023's plans and projects of the government is the another evidence of power of the questions from people. Dhading is a district of Nepal which is connected to the capital city of the Nepal which is not developed. This year people started campaign and protest for their well-being and government declared to develop medicine industry in their locality which helps people to collect raw materials and they get money which helps to improve their life. Many people argue that questioning to the authority can not enhance prosperity of society but it demotivates authority to work. while their view is not completely wrong, people's question makes authority more responsible towards society and people of that area.
The examples above of Nepal shows that the impact of people in society's well-face. Questioning to the authority can enhance well-being of the people of that society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | KruthiHK | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 66 | view |
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 62
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 546, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...amples explained below to emphasize the peoples role enhancing the prosperity oof socie...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ty for their enhancement of well-being. people, who were suffering from many hardships...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...enhance economic status of the society. the prosperity of society enhanced when peo...
^^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...y but it demotivates authority to work. while their view is not completely wrong, peo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49544072948 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81533795616 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474164133739 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6952127595 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310085351463 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125628716605 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541024570512 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225432774872 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210826252343 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.