The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different subjects in 2001.
In general, US teachers worked the most hours, while Japanese teachers spent the least time at school. There was a stark difference in working hours between upper secondary teachers, lower secondary teacher, and primary school teacher.
Teacher primary school in Japan worked 600 hours, but teacher primary school in USA worked over 700 hours, equivalent to the number of Spanish school teachers were at work. The lower secondary school in all four countries had the same level, but the teacher in the USA spent 1000 hours. Both Spain and Iceland had the same number of 900 hours to teach. The USA high school achieved 1200 hours spent most time at school. Finland and Japan had the least amount of time spent teaching at 500 hours. Canada had the same amount of hours as the US at 1200. Overall, the US teachers had the highest amount of time spent teaching. Therefore, it can be concluded that the US teachers have the highest amount of time spent teaching, followed by Canada, with Spain and Iceland tied for third place. Japan and Finland had the least amount of time spent teaching.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 67
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task Write a letter to a friend expressing your interest to seek employment in a different country Your letter should include why you want to work in a different country what type of work you will be looking for q
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, therefore, third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78365384615 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15671490786 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471153846154 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6317191207 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9166666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156194762584 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813925155359 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112250682451 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207555865207 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165749684158 0.0819641961636 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.