Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is started that acquiring information about global lifestyles through video records is much more effective than writing documents. I admit that video recordings leave a greater lasting impression on people's minds than other forms of media. But I disagree with the idea that some people don't have the right environment to learn.
On the one hand, video records can directly watch videos or pictures from another country. That thing makes people's minds remember better. To explain, images and audio recordings enable people to observe things authentically. Thus, they can experience customs rather than imagining them through a secondhand perspective when reading written documents. For instance, if someone wants to watch news on video. It makes people remember things like some of the accidents happen around them, we don’t know and when watching video we can see the picture clearly.
On the other hand, some people are only capable of reading documents rather than watching videos. Because watching video they don't have enough information and in the past they don’t have modern technology so at that time they don’t know how to use it. It is quite challenging for some people who will not watch video. For example, people want to learn how to cook, they choose a document is the best way to read it. It has more and enough information for people who need it
In conclusion, video recordings are significant for visualisation. However, it is not suitable for some individuals who prefer to learn by writing documents. So, people should choose a document appropriately to use it effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-21 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | dominhthanh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The table below shows key data on the demographics of four different countries
- the charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organisations in 2008 and 2014 78
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...disagree with the idea that some people dont have the right environment to learn. O...
^^^^
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...o. It makes people remember things like some of the accidents happen around them, we don’t ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ing videos. Because watching video they dont have enough information and in the past...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14559386973 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68818660719 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2759267449 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9375 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264105987679 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934092424526 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467419767154 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163603558303 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04271180998 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.