International travel is becoming cheaper, and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages?
As can be seen, travelers are now under the benefits of not only paying less on international tourism but are also welcomed by a majority of countries. From my perspective, the advantages of this trend, particularly relation improvement and economic growth, can overshadow its drawback which is pollution.
To begin with, once international travel becomes affordable, most countries can make an improvement to its own economy. In such modern society, most nations now count on tourism as the main source of economy, particularly the developing countries. For example, Singapore, which used to be one of the poorest countries in South East Asia, has been enhancing their GDP rates by means of having a friendly affodable travelling policy. Moreover, cheap abroad journeys help improve travelers' knowledge. The more people go, there more they learn. About a decade ago, international traveling fee was prohibitively expensive, which prevented people from traveling. Nevertheless, thanks to fee reduction, more and more people have been able to go abroad, which helps them expand their horizon as the more they go, the more knowledgeable they become. My uncle, for instance, is an engineer who invented a modern stem system, learnt about this system from a country he had taken a trip to.
Nevertheless, from my viewpoint, there still be a remarkable drawback of international tourism, which is pollution. There are several tourists coming from other countries who are lack of awareness. When they take a trip to a nation, they litter almost every place that they pay visits to, which gives rise to the fact that that country has to spend a larger amount to tackle pollution. Consequently, many regions around the world have deeply fine international tourists in case they litter.
In conclusion, international travel brings people both advantages and disadvantages. In fact, knowledge improvement and economic growth are the two benefits overshadowing the drawback of pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | Bao Chau Phan | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-03 | Black_rosie | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-03 | Black_rosie | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-20 | thuiinh | 69 | view |
- International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 to 2012 61
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 61
- The pie charts display the proportion of key sources of energy used in the USA between 1980s and 1990s 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...al tourists coming from other countries who are lack of awareness. When they take a tri...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3729903537 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05074719478 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591639871383 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0957342677 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243101753481 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802378944537 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581946750622 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128168770161 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649964962199 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.