In recent years, some countries have experienced rapid economic development. This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country side. This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole. What are these problems? How might they be reduced?
The gap between urban areas and rural regions is prevalent in many parts of the world. This situation, which is thought to stem from the global trend of swift economic advancement results in the inequality in living conditions of both aforementioned areas. This essay aims to shed the light into the root causes of this issue and present several probable solutions
On the one hand, the causes leading to the differences in living standard can be attributed to the large wave of migration from rural areas to big metropolitan areas for better wages along with lack of investment for basic infrastructure in the countryside. First and foremost, the increasing rate of urbanization motivate large rural population, whose age tends be young to relocate to big cities in hope of better jobs, which in turn guarantee lucrative income. As the results, the remaining rural inhabitants are unable to muster a robust economy, which is vital for the initiation of infrastructure build-up. For example, the villages in far-away regions in Japan are filled with abandoned homes and lackluster facilities as their inhabitants have already left for the cities leaving behind old residents. Moreover, as the urban areas attract an enormous pool of population, which promise better and more visible results of modernization, investments from government and investors tend to favor these densely populated regions instead of the countryside. Take the urbanization of Hanoi as an example, the suburban districts, whose population density is significant received more investments for various facilities such as commerce, housing than their counterparts in more rural areas
On the other hand, the solution to this imbalance can be initiated through numerous notions such as economic vitalization programs and the fairer distribution of investment stream. Specifically, the stimulation of rural economy would resume the demand for large workforce, which consequently halts the trend of urban migration. Hence, as the people perceive the prospect of building up their life in their birthplace, their drive for relocation would eventually subside. As the result, once the rural regions can sustain their population as well as its promising livelihood, the living standard would inevitably improves. Moreover, the fairness in investment ultimately ensures the equitable chances of development for all areas so that the lacking regions would receive the assistance they require for development. Therefore, with equal share of aids, all regions in the country would have the necessary resources to enhance their situation regardless whether they are cities or countrysides.
In conclusion, the imbalance in living standard between cities and countries takes the roots from the population drain by unequal career prospect and lack of investment. Yet, rural economic vitalization and equal investment can mitigate this situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | songuyen14 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | songuyen14 | 82 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | fighttosurvey | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | fighttosurvey | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | fighttosurvey | 84 | view |
- Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after repairing old buildings so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In recent years some countries have experienced rapid economic development This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country side This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole What are these pro 82
- The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 w 78
- In recent years some countries have experienced rapid economic development This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country side This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole What are these pro 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and present several probable solutions On the one hand, the causes leading to t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 614, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'improve'
Suggestion: improve
...d, the living standard would inevitably improves. Moreover, the fairness in investment u...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 33.0 8.3376753507 396% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2468.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 444.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55855855856 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98666652536 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 776.7 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.9304270432 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.533333333 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188122298786 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065498726903 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325170495393 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128504749552 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184647638881 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.56 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.