Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undoubtedly that expressing complete honesty to build strong bond with others becomes a prominent factor in a relationship. I, personally, state the same perspective of this phenomenon which will be deliberated more below.
On the one side, being truthful fosters a sense of self-confidence in a relationship, sadly, it might harm closest persons sometimes, particularly oldsters. It appear when the truth, serious traffic accident happening to ones, is informed to elderlies, this would shock them, and afflict higher blood pressure, even heart attack due to their vulnerable physical conditions. Furthermore, mostly individuals would feel intimidated or offended when they express honesty to others. As opposed to accept one’s experience to seize greater opportunities he earned, others may spread malicious rumours about him deliberately. Thus, those who tell the truth about their journey can undergo great depression.
On the flip side, it is the consensus view that human being are social creatures, and maintaining honesty creates harmonious relationship and close-knit family in long-term. Being closer to people whom ones can always tell hones will receive bunch of affection and support he needs. Therefore, if one of family members faces a problem, probably marital life, others will calmly deliver the viable solutions. In addition, one of effective preventions against various abuses is disclosing the crime committed by perpetrators. This appears to be the best solution to release psychotrauma, published by Australian government, AIFS, being supportive and reassuring their story helps them to recover better.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, developing trust to keep connecting with people are more crucial. This includes strengthening human interaction as well as combating the violent assaults. This is as long as the truth can be delivered without inducing greater problems.
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 80
- In many cities planners tend to arrange shops schools offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In some countries more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college university or even after finding a job Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 84
- Alternative energy sources that use the natural power of the wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'harm the closest'.
Suggestion: harm the closest
...ence in a relationship, sadly, it might harm closest persons sometimes, particularly oldster...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'appears'?
Suggestion: appears
...ns sometimes, particularly oldsters. It appear when the truth, serious traffic acciden...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69122807018 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08078167982 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694736842105 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5269890971 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.133333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0950492938188 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306964937935 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315543061473 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525121357629 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020643515168 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'harm the closest'.
Suggestion: harm the closest
...ence in a relationship, sadly, it might harm closest persons sometimes, particularly oldster...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'appears'?
Suggestion: appears
...ns sometimes, particularly oldsters. It appear when the truth, serious traffic acciden...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69122807018 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08078167982 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694736842105 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5269890971 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.133333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0950492938188 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306964937935 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315543061473 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525121357629 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020643515168 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.