The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures depict the evolution of the horse from 40 million years ago to recently.
Overall, there are four stages that mark the differences that occurred to the horse, beginning with the Eohippus, which existed 40 million years ago and ending with the development of the modern horse.
40 million years ago, the size and the tail of the first horse called Eohippus was relatively small. In terms of the foot structure, the first horse had the most toes in its foot. In the next stage, the Mesohippus was a slightly better version of the previous one, with a bigger size, a longer tail and legs. There were also less toes in the foot structure of this species compared to that of the Eohippus. The following period saw the existence of Merychippus, the horse that had more mane fur than the previous horses. It was evident that its tail and legs grew longer than the older horses. The final stage was the evolution to become the modern horse, with a mane thickened of fur, a longer tail and a basic foot structure.
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 84
- The diagram below shows how soft cheese is made 73
- Parents are putting a lot of pressure on their children to succeed Is it a positive or negative development 61
- The widespread use of Internet has brought many problems What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of Internet What solutions can you suggest 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun toes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...a longer tail and legs. There were also less toes in the foot structure of this spec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61538461538 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31842090095 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2273628291 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120839731868 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569113174559 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626654782038 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111801424784 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420482572144 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.