Some people believe that it í a good idea that older people continue to work if it is possible for them to do. Do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that senior citizens ought to continue contributing to their work as long as they are able. While there are clearly some advantages to this line of thinking, I partly disagree due to all the drawbacks it presents.
On the one hand, the argument that older people should continue working is reasonable to some extent. The first reason for this is the fact that it could provide these seniors with a sense of purpose as we all need as human beings. By working and contributing their part to society, the general happiness level as well as well-being could be greatly enhanced, which in turn, will prevent depression as well as the feeling of being completely useless. Another reason for supporting this idea is the fact that age usually, if not always, comes with experience. This notion will allow the senior workers to work more efficiently with their existing knowledge in a field. As a result, companies could now save more time and resources to train new inexperienced workers, and instead allocate all of that into expanding the business further.
On the other hand, despite the above-mentioned benefits, there are a variety of reasons why I believe older workers should not be permitted to work even when they can. The main reason is that by allowing senior workers to continue their work, younger workers or freshly graduated students will be directly left in a position with no place to work on themselves and advance further in their careers. This could lead to the fact that they can be inexperienced as well as lack of practice, which will profoundly affect the competency of the future workforce. The second reason is that even though older workers are more experienced in their field, they could also be more rigid and less flexible when it comes to new technologies or new ways to do their work. This inadaptability to change could directly pose an enormous threat to their overall efficiency, which as a result could harm a business in the long run.
To conclude, for all the reasons listed above, I strongly contend that older citizens should not be allowed to work even when they are able. It is advisable that seniors engage in some forms of recreational activities to ease their minds as well as to increase their overall wellbeing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-15 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | HManh | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-13 | lethaianh | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | areyoucrazy | 74 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | darklord1611 | 84 | view |
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopement 73
- The chart and graph give information about three categories of workers in Australia and the unemployment levels within those groups 73
- The diagrams below show how a park in a city changed over time 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, while, as to, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86889460154 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65050653119 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496143958869 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.0551746465 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.266666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146528751504 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576960855112 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599894778305 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948140944321 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129483328241 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.