In many countries, people buy a range of household goods.
Is it a positive or negative development?
I believe that the phenomenon of increasing purchases of consumer goods is generally positive, although there are a few minor drawbacks.
First of all, the increased consumption of essential products, such as produce or domestic appliances, certainly leads to economic growth. This is because many manufacturers can maintain their production capacity due to consistent demand from consumers, or even expand their businesses if the economic climate is propitious, ultimately generating jobs and keep money circulating in an economy. As a result, many Western countries tend to prioritize policies fostering public consumption, such as issuing credits to buyers going shopping frequently and lowering interest rates for innovative producers like Samsung contributing to the overall level consumption of a nation.
Furthermore, the habit of purchasing household goods enables businesses to remain innovative as the process of research and development of a new product is often financially taxing. Therefore, barring consistent profits from selling older models, such businesses are viably unable to innovate further. For this reason, it is undeniable that the purchasing ability of consumers plays a vital role in facilitating technology advancements.
However, it should be of note if this buying habit is not monitored thoroughly, it will lead to unnecessary debts and even bad debts, undermining the economy. Moreover, overconsumption of household products can translate into huge amounts of non-biodegradable waste, degrading the environment. Nevertheless, such issues are being addressed quietly effectively by technologies and environmental rules.
In conclusion, people in many countries are being encouraged to consume domestic products due to the beneficial effects on economic development and technology development despite certain drawbacks in terms of banking and the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-13 | vidung | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | vuhongminh | 61 | view |
- some believe that money is the most important consideration when people choose a job Do you agree or disagree with this idea 90
- Some people believe that handwriting is no longer useful in the modern world and should not be taught in schools To what extent do you agree or disagree 100
- many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 92
- Some people think that the best way to get news is through the newspaper while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Ohers however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
I believe that the phenomenon of increasi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0110701107 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34297385425 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653136531365 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.359823918 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.090909091 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4545454545 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158075833664 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503539085711 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596224581514 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852401442502 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056718983645 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.18 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.