Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the city's expansion and the governments' attention to develop public transport or roads and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although developing the public transport is beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others do not consider its mefits. I am inclined to believe that this issue can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the expansion of the public transportation instead investing on new roads by governments provide the society with noticeable benefits which are rooted in the fact of the transport development. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these advantages. Firstly, the transport development declining the air pollution. Vehicles and cars produce a considerable amount of smoke annually which is quite hazardous and increase the amount of carbon dioxide emission. Hence, this type of transportation is healthier and environmentally friendly. Furthermore, producing the carbon dioxide emission can lead to global warming and climate change.
In addition, the development of public transportation can easily diminish the number of car accidents. Thus, it is absolutely safe. Also, the public transport has the ability to reduce the costs including the costs of parking, insurance and other services which settlers should spend for their cars. Therefor, the public transport can save money.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of investing on the public transportation are far more outweigh focusing on the expansion of building new roads.
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face to-face because of technology. What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole? 88
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example. 77
- Some people believe that the sole aim of higher education is to make people ready for employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss. 85
- People usually mix their private and professional life. What are the pros and cons of this? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...enomenon of the citys expansion and the governments attention to develop public transport o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, so, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62962962963 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17952986319 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603703703704 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2295775533 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214229373595 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667712783168 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524970060692 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124840804386 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334328181641 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.