As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp

Essay topics:

As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.

Recently, create better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. There is a school of thought that creating better networks of public transportation is good over building more roads, whereas there are those who maintain contradict view. However, it does not seem unreasonable to suggest that building more roads are also good for avoid traffic problems. In this essay, I will elaborate with positive and negative sides with clear examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.

To commence with, there are myriad of reasons why mass transportation is good, are as follows. At the heart of this matter is that pollution in our cities is aggravated to be more precise, it is conclusively clear that improving mass transportation can help mitigating the pressure without excessive pollutants discharged.

Nevertheless, there are pitfalls that negate with this argument and that can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of mass transportation over public transportation, still the most alarming one rooted to the fact that building more roads can help to reduce time of travel. Moreover, building new roads do in fact give access to remote area of residence and industrial sites.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that as per aforementioned arguments, benefits of mass transportations far outweigh merits of building more roads and thus they are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-12 Yuli 77 view
2023-01-12 Yuli 77 view
2022-11-04 fereshteh.r 85 view
2022-11-04 fereshteh.r 55 view
2022-11-04 fereshteh.r 88 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user jemis7048 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thus lead to a plausible conclusion. To commence with, there are myriad of re...
^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to mitigate' or 'mitigate'.
Suggestion: to mitigate; mitigate
... improving mass transportation can help mitigating the pressure without excessive pollutan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut excessive pollutants discharged. Nevertheless, there are pitfalls that ne...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a of residence and industrial sites. To put it in a nutshell, I pen down sayi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us they are indeed too great to ignore.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, whereas, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37931034483 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07127721924 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599137931034 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2104428561 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287863267651 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128808302305 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155040510434 0.071462118173 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149188582982 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125934107506 0.0609392437508 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.