Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change.
Recently, air travel has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the advantages and disadvantages of the development of air travel?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial only for rich people, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economy standpoint, transportation systems are bound up inextricably with large investment, which indicates they lead to both better life and easy communication. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between public transport and large distance as well as an exponential increase in cost. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of airplane is correlated positively with not only developed countries but also intercontinental.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, ordinary people attribute to average income, in that it would come down to family expenditure, children's caring, and career. A salient example of such attribution is disease problems, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take quick travel for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint family's economic problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to hospitalization, job interview, and even immigration. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of air travel development in country's progress.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that more consideration must be taken into account to facilitate this transport system for ordinary people. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | gurwinder singh sandhu | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | gurwinder singh sandhu | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-10 | arami | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
- The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. How far you agree? 85
- Students with degree earn high salary than who doesn't have an academic qualification. Therefore, some argue that they have to pay the full cost of their courses. Give your opinion? 88
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples 88
- We have entered a throw-away society and fill the environment with rubbish. What are the causes and what are your solutions? 77
- “Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society”. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the economy standpoint, transportat...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untries but also intercontinental. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... development in countrys progress. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79180887372 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28866466257 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692832764505 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9150109187 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.538461538 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0334676457815 0.242375264174 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0104082834122 0.0925447433944 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0218430904978 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0210697185795 0.151781067708 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168412186948 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.