Education system that assess the student's learning by written exam is correct? Discuss your view?
There has long been much contention about the evolution of teaching methods, its effectiveness and growing emphasis on methods to assess a learner’s performance. Formal written examination is used widely as one of the effective assessment methods. While some people believe that this method usually reflects student’s learning capability on paper, others think otherwise. In my opinion, I would say that it is the most effective method compared to other existing ones in assessing students' academic performances.
To begin with, formal assessment is systematic, a pre-planned efficient method that is being used in the education system for many centuries. This method is helpful for teachers to see how much students have learned throughout their coursework and provides an insight into each student’s learning abilities. In our contemporary school systems, formal written examinations are organized at fixed intervals such as quarterly, half early and annual to assess the level of knowledge in students and in the case of failure, they are made to repeat the class. In addition, formal examinations are a better way to test the memory of a student and their grasping power.
One of the significant benefits of written examination is that it is the only way to stop students from cheating via other forms of examination. For instance, student’s take home assignment could be easily completed by others, hence will not reflect their actual knowledge. Furthermore, formal written examination allows the students to demonstrate their individual knowledge in their exams. Often student feels little nervousness and stressed when they take part in an important exam. However, coping with this stress and anxiety at this level would eventually help them to overcome fear at the later stage of their professional life. Had examination not been imposed in school, students would not have been motivated to pay attention in class. Hence, it is strongly believed that written examination should be the appropriate formal assessment for children.
In conclusion, it is clear from all the aforementioned points that through formal written examinations, educators get a view of children who require informed assistance. In particular, the early diagnosis of deviation in student’s attributes and pedagogical methods of teaching makes it possible to identify and address the weaknesses before they become irremediable. Therefore, I strongly believe that formal written examination is the utter most appropriate method to assess students' academic knowledge effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | gupta-vikas | 62 | view |
| 2018-10-23 | JANJAN | 72 | view |
| 2022-02-02 | essay123 | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | Rajnikant Chauhan | 88 | view |
- Should we preserve past historical buildings? How much care should be taken by their owners in terms of maintenance? 77
- Pros and cons of adventures sports/dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bunjee jumping etc. and weather u support them or not. 72
- Do you think that English will remain to be a global language despite globalisation? 77
- Whether English will remain to be the global language despite globalization 76
- Education system that assess the student's learning by written exam is correct? Discuss your view? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...thod is helpful for teachers to see how much students have learned throughout their ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudents academic knowledge effectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 31.9359605911 169% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 1207.87684729 182% => OK
No of words: 390.0 242.827586207 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64615384615 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 3.92707691288 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13735106884 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 139.433497537 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 379.143842365 181% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0869700022 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275126203386 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088330370096 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361919727613 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178717208344 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256507020285 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.