The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Do you Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of illiterates and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that enabling to writing highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that reading can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From illiteracy standpoint, learning can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that unable to working new technologies, as well as ATM, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered 80 percent having the problem with navel technologies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both writing and reading can be seen.
Within the realm of unable to finding a good job, facing a lot of problems might increase the consequences of isolated from society. Moreover, fundamental aspects of utilizing new technologies relate to this reality that the demerits of literacy skills pertain to modern era 21st century. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of reading ability is correlated negatively with illiterates problems. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being deprived from school.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of science far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the indispensable part of our life prove the significance of improving the person imagination, but also pinpoints of the definition of literacy implications.
- do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? what is the reason for that? 11
- The environment we live in is in danger. what are the underlying causes? who is responsible to combat this? 11
- can the internet replace the classroom teacher?discuss your views. 35
- do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? what are the reasons for that ? 77
- Give an example of an accomplished person whose success did not have any effect on his bad neighborhood.many people think that regions affect successfully person. what is your opinion about the native active region?and accomplishment persons influence the 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55303030303 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25087400835 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662878787879 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9602986961 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.166666667 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100580111299 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352538173977 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340674426913 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053516094052 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247528486426 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.