With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only
procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give your own point of view.
Recently, the phenomenon of online digital media has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " what are the advantages and disadvantages of this issue?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that the role of the library has become obsolete. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, digital media is bound up inextricably with libraries, which indicates they lead to both cognitive skills and e-books. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between online resources and textbooks as well as an exponential increase in virtual courses. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of universities is correlated positively with not only obsolete roles but also digital media procurements.
Within the realm of technology, without the slightest doubt, online digital media attribute to cyber education, in that it would come down to computers, the internet, and websites. A salient example of such attribution is electronic book readers, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take smartphones for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint online learning problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to tablets, technology developments, and even learning software. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of digital media in changing the role of libraries.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that universities should procure more digital media and also update textbooks. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-19 | crycoffee | 88 | view |
| 2018-12-16 | brandnewiman | 88 | view |
- The world's governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues. Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet and give the solution. 88
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 77
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as environmental problems – thatwe should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding? 85
- As cities expanding some people believe the government should look forward to creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What's your opinion? Give some examples o 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and disadvantages of this issue?'. Whereas, it is a widely held view that the role...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64163822526 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13895963584 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645051194539 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5012410231 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.071428571 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31556518646 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878608680353 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765822172571 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171035443668 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514651319366 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.